Try the software Get a quote
The honest comparison

Old software rarely fails.
It just quietly taxes you.

It never breaks outright. It just costs you an hour here, a wrong number there, and one person nobody can afford to lose. Here is the same Monday, both ways.

Right now

Nobody knows the real number

And finding out takes half a day.

Every branch keeps its own spreadsheet
The same figure typed in three places
One person understands the file — and they are on leave
Month-end takes a week and still does not tally
You hear about a problem after it cost you money
You work around the software
With Munimo

One screen. The real number.

Before your first cup of tea is finished.

Every branch on one live screen
Entered once, correct everywhere
Anyone in your team can run it
Books close on the first of the month
You get told the moment something goes wrong
The software works the way you do
Where it actually hurts

Five costs that never
appear on the invoice.

Re-keying between systems

The same number typed in three places. At least one is wrong, and nobody finds out until month-end.

The person who is the system

One employee understands the file and the workaround. Their notice period is your business risk.

Answers that take days

A simple question means pulling exports and matching them by hand. So decisions get made on instinct.

Change you have stopped asking for

After enough refusals, people stop asking. Your business improves; the software never does.

Risk you cannot see

No updates, untested backups, and logins for people who left years ago. Invisible until the day it is not.

Training that never ends

New staff learn the software and the folklore around it. Both take months.

Side by side

The same eight questions,
answered both ways.

Situation
Legacy / off-the-shelf
Custom-built
When you need something changed
Raise a request. Wait for a release. Hear it is on the roadmap, or that your version no longer gets changes.
Say it on a call. Small changes usually land in days, because the people who built it still have it open.
When your process is unusual
You change your process to suit the software, or you keep a spreadsheet beside it. Usually both.
The software is built around the process you already have, including the parts that are unusual for a reason.
Who understands the system
One person. Everyone hopes they do not leave.
It is documented, and the way it works matches how the business already thinks. New staff learn it in days.
Getting your data out
A flat export, if you are lucky. Structure and history stay behind.
Your data is yours, exportable with its structure intact, whenever you want it.
What it costs each year
Licence renewals per user, plus fifteen to twenty per cent annual maintenance, plus charges for changes.
Buy the licence outright or subscribe. Three years of maintenance included, no per-change invoice.
When you grow
A bigger edition, a bigger bill, and a migration you did not plan for.
More users, branches or modules added to the same system. No re-implementation.
Working away from a desk
A cut-down mobile view that needs a live connection, or nothing at all.
An offline-first app that captures in the field with no signal, and syncs into the same books.
When something goes wrong
A ticket number, a queue, and a support tier that decides how long you wait.
A message to the people who wrote the code, and a fix rather than a workaround.
Be fair about it

When you should not
build custom software.

We would rather say this now than take a project that should not exist. Custom is the wrong answer more often than our industry admits.

What you do is genuinely standard

If your process is the same as everyone else's in your trade, a well-supported package will be cheaper, faster and better tested than anything built for you alone.

Nobody internally will own it

Custom software needs one person on your side who can decide what it should do. Without that, the build drifts and everyone ends up disappointed.

The real problem is the process

If the workflow itself is broken, new software will only make the mess run faster. Fix the process first, then build to it.

Moving across

Nobody switches on a promise.

The fear of migration keeps more companies on bad software than the cost of replacing it. So we take the risky day out of it entirely.

01

We read what you have

Exports where they exist, the underlying database where they do not, printouts where there is genuinely nothing else. Old software being uncooperative is normal and rarely a blocker.

02

We import and reconcile

Masters, opening balances and as much history as is worth bringing. Then we reconcile until the new system agrees with the old one, figure for figure.

03

Both systems run together

Usually for a month. Your team uses the new one for real work while the old one stays available. Any disagreement between them gets found here, not after the switch.

04

You decide when to stop

When the numbers match and your people are comfortable, the old system becomes an archive. There is no single dramatic switchover night.

Questions

Before you move.

Is off-the-shelf software always the wrong choice?
No, and we will tell you when it is the right one. If what you do is genuinely standard, a well-supported package is cheaper and faster than anything custom. Custom earns its money when your process is a real competitive difference, when the gap is being filled by spreadsheets and manual work, or when the package is dictating how you operate instead of the other way round.
How do we know if we have outgrown our current system?
The usual signs: numbers are re-keyed between systems, month-end takes days, several people keep private spreadsheets that the real answer actually lives in, one person is the only one who understands the file, and simple questions from management take hours to answer. If two or three of those are true, the software is costing you more than its licence.
What does a migration actually involve?
We map your existing data, import masters and opening balances, and reconcile until the new system agrees with the old one. Then both run together for a period — usually a month — while your team gets comfortable. Only when the numbers match and people trust it do you switch. Nobody is asked to go live on a promise.
How much history can we bring across?
Usually as much as you want. Opening balances and masters are essential; full transaction history is normally possible and worth doing when you need year-on-year comparison. We will tell you what is realistic once we have seen your data.
What if the old system cannot export properly?
That is common with older software. We can usually read the underlying database directly, or work from reports and printouts where there is genuinely nothing else. It adds time but it is rarely a blocker.
Will our team cope with the change?
Better than they cope with the current workarounds, generally. The screens are built around what they already do, and the running-in-parallel period means nobody is forced to learn under pressure. Training people on software shaped like their own process is a much shorter conversation.

Not sure which side you are on?

Tell us what your current system does badly. We will tell you honestly whether it is worth replacing — including when it is not.

Tell us what you need Try the software first

No sales call needed to look around. Every product on this site is live and usable right now.